Faced with increasingly stringent federal efficiency mandates, automakers have employed a host fuel saving measures in recent years. Technologies like direct injection, automatic stop/start, and variable valve timing have all been developed in pursuit of fuel economy improvements, but some of these features have side effects that can compromise a vehicle’s drivability and create maintenance issues down the road.
“The OEMs are constantly under the gun to improve fuel economy to meet these rising standards,” says Michael Litsch, Sr. Product Manager for domestic tuning at Holley Performance Brands. “But at the same time, some of these automakers want to put V8s in their trucks, SUVs, and muscle cars. So they’re looking everywhere they can to save a bit a fuel here and there. And in an effort to try and meet those standards with these big-displacement engines, in the mid-2000s GM and Chrysler developed systems that would mechanically deactivate cylinders in the engine during light-load driving scenarios, like during steady-state highway cruising and other situations like that.”
Features like General Motors’ Active Fuel Management (AFM) and Chrysler’s Multi-Displacement System (MDS) can disable four of the engine’s eight cylinders under these light-load conditions, while GM’s newer Dynamic Fuel Management (DFM) system can deactivate up to six cylinders at a time.
“It’s enough power to maintain that cruising speed. And at a glance, the concept seems sound – if you’re only running on half of the engine’s cylinders, you’re probably using half of the fuel, right? But it doesn’t work that way,” Litsch says. “Power output is a function of burning fuel, and you’re not burning a ton of fuel to maintain a constant highway speed on eight cylinders. And because you’ve dropped down from eight to four cylinders, you generally have to burn a little more fuel in each of those four cylinders in order to maintain the required amount of torque to keep the vehicle moving. So it’s ultimately not as beneficial as it might seem on the surface. But you’d never know that as an owner because these displacement on demand systems are enabled by default, so you never actually see what the fuel economy would be under normal driving conditions without the system operating. It almost seems like something that was designed to address specific testing methods rather than real-world use cases.”
To add insult to injury, these systems are also known to create drivability compromises as well.
“For example, when you’re operating on four cylinders and you suddenly need all eight cylinders again for passing power or some other reason, there’s a transition that occurs. And no matter how sophisticated the design of the system is, that transition is going to take a tangible amount of time,” he tells us.
“So you’re cruising along and you give it some throttle to pass another vehicle or go up a hill, there is going to be a delay in that throttle response as the system brings those disabled cylinders back to life. If you jump on throttle and the first that happens is the engine says, ‘hey, wait, hang on a second while I get everything figured out,’ it degrades the driving experience. But again, most folks don’t realize that’s what is happening because they’ve never had an opportunity to drive the vehicle without that feature enabled.”
Shop all of DiabloSport's AFR and tuning solutions here.
These cylinder deactivation systems can also create issues for folks who’ve installed an aftermarket exhaust system on their vehicle. “The factory exhaust system on any vehicle that’s equipped with cylinder deactivation technology is engineered to not sound weird when the tech shuts those cylinders off,” he says. “The problem is that if you decide to upgrade your exhaust system, the aftermarket systems are designed to sound good when the engine is operating on all eight cylinders. But when those cylinders are deactivated, an aftermarket system is going make the engine sound awful. That’s actually one of the main reasons that people seek out a way to disable these cylinder deactivation technologies.”
But the most egregious issue created by these displacement on demand systems is that, over time, they can actually cause serious mechanical damage to the engine itself.